Theft is a criminal offence under section 72 of the Crimes Act 1958 (Vic). In simple terms, a person commits theft if they dishonestly take property that belongs to someone else, intending to permanently deprive that person of it.

Theft charges may be heard in either the Magistrates’ Court or the County Court of Victoria, depending on the circumstances and value of the alleged offending. At Angus Cameron and Partners, we represent clients at all levels of the court system and can advise you on the best approach to your matter from the outset.

Theft can arise in many different circumstances — from shoplifting and fraud to misappropriating money held on someone else’s behalf. If you have been charged with theft, it is important to get legal advice promptly. The elements of the offence are more technical than they might appear, and there are defences that may be available depending on the circumstances.

Elements

The prosecution must prove three elements beyond reasonable doubt:

  • you appropriated property belonging to another person;
  • you intended to permanently deprive that person of the property; and
  • you acted dishonestly.
Appropriation

Appropriation means assuming the rights of an owner over property. This is a broad concept — it is not limited to physically taking something. Any act that interferes with or usurps the owner’s rights in the property can amount to an appropriation. This includes situations where you came by the property lawfully but later dealt with it as if it were your own.

Property

Property includes money, physical objects, and intangible property such as debts or other financial rights. Land can only be stolen in limited circumstances, and wild animals can only be stolen in certain situations as well.

Belonging to another

Property belongs to another person if that person has possession or control of it, or has any ownership right or interest in it. This is a broader concept than it might seem — even if you have some ownership interest in property yourself, it can still “belong to another” if that other person also has rights in it. For example, property jointly owned with a partner can still be stolen from that partner.

Property that has been genuinely abandoned — where the owner has deliberately given up all rights to it — does not belong to anyone and cannot be stolen.

Intention to permanently deprive

The prosecution must prove that you intended to permanently deprive the other person of the property. Borrowing something, with a genuine intention to return it, is generally not theft. However, the law treats certain situations as equivalent to an intention to permanently deprive, including:

  • treating the property as your own to dispose of, regardless of the owner’s rights — for example, pawning someone else’s belongings; and
  • borrowing property in circumstances that are effectively equivalent to an outright taking — for example, taking something in a way that fundamentally alters or destroys its value before returning it.

For motor vehicles, the law presumes an intention to permanently deprive if you took or used the vehicle without the owner’s consent. “Use” is interpreted broadly — it does not require the vehicle to have been moved and can include being a passenger in it.

Dishonesty

Dishonesty has a specific legal meaning in theft cases. You are not considered to have acted dishonestly if, at the time of the appropriation, you genuinely believed:

  • you had a legal right to take the property, on your own behalf or on behalf of someone else;
  • the owner would have consented to the taking if they had known about it and the circumstances; or
  • the owner could not be found by taking reasonable steps (except where you were holding the property as a trustee or executor).

These beliefs do not need to be reasonable — but they do need to be honestly held. Whether a belief was genuinely held is a question for the jury, and the reasonableness of the belief is relevant to assessing that.

Defences

Being charged with theft does not mean you will be convicted. There are several defences that may apply depending on the circumstances of your case.

Consent

If you genuinely believed the owner would have consented to you taking the property had they known the circumstances, this may negate dishonesty. Again, the belief must be honestly held.

No intention to permanently deprive

If you took property with a genuine intention to return it, and the circumstances do not bring your conduct within the deeming provisions, the prosecution may not be able to prove the necessary intention. This defence is highly fact-specific.

Insufficient evidence or improperly obtained evidence

The prosecution must prove each element of the offence beyond reasonable doubt. If the evidence is weak — for example, if there is insufficient proof that you were the person who took the property, or that you acted dishonestly — the charge may not be made out. Where evidence has been obtained unlawfully, there may also be grounds to seek its exclusion.

FAQs

What is the difference between theft and robbery?

Theft involves taking property dishonestly and without consent. Robbery is theft accompanied by the use of force or the threat of force against a person. Robbery is a more serious offence and carries heavier penalties.

Can I be charged with theft if I intended to return the property?

Generally, borrowing property with a genuine intention to return it is not theft. However, if you dealt with the property as if it were your own — for example, by pawning it or using it in a way that destroyed its value — the law may treat this as an intention to permanently deprive, even if you planned to return it eventually.

What if I genuinely thought the property was mine to take?

If you had an honest belief that you had a legal right to the property, you may not have acted dishonestly, and the charge of theft may not be made out. This is called a claim of right. The belief does not need to have been reasonable, but it must have been genuinely held.

What are the penalties for theft in Victoria?

Theft carries a maximum penalty of 10 years imprisonment under the Crimes Act 1958 (Vic). The actual sentence will depend on the value of the property, the circumstances of the offending, and your personal history.

Do I need a lawyer if I'm charged with theft?

Yes. Even though theft may seem straightforward, the legal elements — particularly dishonesty and intention — are technical and fact-specific. An experienced criminal lawyer can assess the strength of the prosecution's case and identify any defences available to you.

Is theft an indictable offence in Victoria?

Theft can be heard in either the Magistrates’ Court or the County Court depending on the circumstances and value of the alleged offending. Where the value is significant or the circumstances are serious, the matter may be committed to the County Court.

What is the difference between theft and fraud?

Both are dishonesty offences, but they operate differently. Theft involves the direct appropriation of property. Fraud involves obtaining a financial advantage or causing financial disadvantage through deception. Both can arise from the same fact pattern, and in some cases a person faces charges of both offences.

What are the sentencing options for theft in Victoria?

The Magistrate or Judge has a broad range of sentencing options, including fines, community correction orders, adjourned undertakings (good behaviour bonds), and in more serious cases, imprisonment. For minor theft offences, non-custodial outcomes are common. We will present the strongest possible case in mitigation to achieve the best available outcome for your circumstances.

Related Guides

You may also find the following guides useful: